A few years ago, I was watching a TV drama in which a group of geniuses solve all sorts of crises, whether they be cybercrimes, medical emergencies, or engineering catastrophes. In one episode, a character was bitten by a venomous snake. One of his colleagues suggested they go out and catch the snake, so they could create antivenom and minimize the envenomation.<\/p>\n
Umm, that’s not how it works. Not at all.<\/p>\n
Before I address antivenom, let me talk a little bit about venom.<\/p>\n
Snake venom has been described as a \u201csoup of antigens.\u201d There are literally dozens of components, many with fancy names like metalloproteinases, serine proteases, phospholipases (PLA2), hyaluronidase, and disintegrins. Most of those words probably mean nothing to you. That\u2019s cool. What’s important is that the various components can cause some combination of local tissue injury, hematologic toxicity, muscle damage, neurological toxicity, and cardiovascular collapse.<\/p>\n
Some venom components are found in multiple species, genera, and families of snakes. Others are found in just a small number of species. Some \u201cingredients\u201d are exclusive to single species. The best way to prevent these various toxins from causing toxicity is to neutralize them. And that is what antivenom does. Large volumes of preformed antibody particles are administered to someone following envenomation, and the antibody fragments render the various venom components inactive.<\/p>\n
So where do these antibodies come from? They come from a host animal. Over the years, many animal species have been used. Although the horse is most common, CroFab is ovine-derived, meaning it comes from sheep. This has important clinical implications, because sheep serum is less likely to elicit an allergic reaction than horse serum, which contains a highly immunogenic immunoglobulin G subclass. Over several months, different flocks of hearty Australian sheep are exposed to small amounts of venom from multiple US snake species. In response, the sheep produce antibodies, which are then processed, purified, and made into a powder, and that\u2019s how you end up with antivenom!<\/p>\n
And CroFab isn\u2019t just one antivenom; it\u2019s four! (However, in 2017 the Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles changed the taxonomic classification so that there are two different cottonmouth species: the northern cottonmouth, Agkistrodon piscivorus, and the Florida cottonmouth, A. conanti. But I digress.) The final antivenom is a blend of antibodies taken from four separate flocks of sheep, each exposed to the venom of a different species.<\/p>\n
The World Health Organization (WHO) has stated that an effective antivenom is derived from clinically relevant snakes<\/i><\/b> that are native to the geographic region where the antivenom will be used<\/i><\/b>, and the snakes used in CroFab production hit both targets. Western diamondback rattlesnake venom has specific metalloproteinases. Eastern diamondback rattlesnake venom has a variety of serine proteases. Mojave toxin is found in Mojave rattlesnake venom. Finally, cottonmouth venom has specific PLA2 isoforms that are also found in copperhead venom. Furthermore, the snakes used in CroFab production are collected from across each snake\u2019s range distribution to address geographic venom variation.<\/p>\n
Incidentally, the antibodies then undergo an affinity purification step that is unique to CroFab. It removes unnecessary antibodies so that only venom-neutralizing antibodies remain. This increases specificity and minimizes nonspecific foreign proteins that can lead to adverse reactions.<\/p>\n
Now that you\u2019ve read a lot of words (roughly 535 prior to the start of this paragraph!), let me summarize and emphasize some points. Snake venom is complex and causes a variety of local and systemic effects. CroFab\u00ae consists of purified antibodies that can neutralize medically important venom components from multiple native snake species, and it should be used for clinically significant envenomations.<\/p>\n
One final, not especially important point. Both \u201cantivenin\u201d and \u201cantivenom\u201d are acceptable; the Associated Press prefers the former, while the WHO endorses the latter in English-speaking countries. Just don\u2019t put a hyphen in the middle of either word. That drives me crazy!<\/p>\n
Dr. Greene is a paid consultant for BTG International Inc.<\/i><\/p>\n
Spencer Greene, MD, MS, FACEP, FACMT, FAACT, FAAEM <\/b>is a board-certified medical toxicologist and emergency physician. He currently serves as the Director of Toxicology and an attending emergency physician at HCA Houston Healthcare-Kingwood. He is a Clinical Professor at the University of Houston College of Medicine. Dr. Greene is a recognized expert in the management of snake envenomation in the US. He has treated more than 1000 snakebites at the bedside and has authored more than 50 scholarly articles and book chapters. He has also served as the course director for the Houston Venom Conference since 2013.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
A few years ago, I was watching a TV drama in which a group of geniuses solve all sorts of crises, whether they be cybercrimes, medical emergencies, or engineering catastrophes. In one episode, a character was bitten by a venomous snake. One of his colleagues suggested they go out and catch the snake, so they […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":1309,"template":"","subjects":[101,96,102],"class_list":["post-1256","insights","type-insights","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","subjects-guest-post","subjects-snake-envenomation","subjects-spencer-greene"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n